Home / Area Code / 343 / 343-307 / 343-307-46 / 343-307-4602

343-307-4602 Report: Low Risk

Here are the caller ID information for 343-307-4602 and comments from other users. If you have any useful information please leave your feedback. You can also mark (343) 307-4602 as safe, unsafe, harassing, hang up, etc. We look forward to any feedback from you to help others.

Area Code: 343
Prefix: 307
Owner name: Danielle Cefaro   View information
County
City: Ottawa
State/Province: Ontario
Use Type: Landline
Carrier: Bell Canada
International format: +13433074602 / 0013433074602
Time Zone: Eastern 15:33:13

User Report stats for 3433074602

  • 46 user

    Secure calls

    The caller is a trusted individual or some institution and is a secure caller.

  • 0 user

    Fraud calls

    Callers are phone scammers who can make you lose money and reveal valuable personal information.

  • 0 user

    Harassing calls

    These callers are deliberately harassing intentional pranks or perverts that can seriously affect your life.

  • 0 user

    Sales calls

    The phone, usually from debt collection, may contain intimidating tone. But it is not excluded that it is an unsafe call.

  • 6 user

    Debt calls

    Usually it is to sell you insurance, car, real estate and other callers. But please be vigilant.

  • 4 user

    Unknown calls

    These calls are calls you haven't heard. You can't be sure who the caller is.

  • 0 user

    Hang up calls

    The phone automatically hangs after a brief ringing. Sometimes it is repeated. Do not rule out harassment or other.

  • 4 user

    Other calls

    This category is the other phone types we have not summarized above.

Comments for 3433074602

  • Santos Maria  3 month ago
    +1-343-307-4602 | Category: Secure Calls
    Skip to main content About Contact Press People Opportunities Issues Free Speech Privacy Creativity and Innovation Transparency International Security Our Work Deeplinks Blog Press Releases Events Legal Cases Whitepapers Podcast Annual Reports Take Action Action Center Electronic Frontier Alliance Volunteer Tools Privacy Badger HTTPS Everywhere Surveillance Self-Defense Certbot Atlas of Surveillance Cover Your Tracks Crocodile Hunter Donate Donate to EFF Shop Other Ways to Give Search Email updates on news, actions, and events in your area. Join EFF Lists Copyright (CC BY) Trademark Privacy Policy Thanks Electronic Frontier Foundation Donate VICTORY! Maine Increases Transparency and Accountability for its Fusion Center DEEPLINKS BLOG By Matthew Guariglia June 26, 2023 Share on Twitter Share on Facebook US flag with spying eyes for stars In a major step for reigning in the unaccountable power of fusion centers, the Maine state House and Senate have passed HP 947, An Act to Increase the Transparency and Accountability of the Maine Information and Analysis Center. The bill creates an Auditor position within the Office of the Attorney General whose job it is to conduct regular reviews of the Main Information and Analysis Center’s (MIAC) activities, to keep records, and to share information with the public. The bill also makes any information MIAC shares with private entities a public record and therefore accessible to the public. This bill comes after a years-long concerted effort by Maine activists and concerned citizens who have been fighting for accountability in how MIAC collects, shares, and utilizes information about Mainers. In June 2021, a bill that would have defunded the fusion center entirely passed 88-54 out of the Maine House of Representatives before being defeated in the state senate. Fusion centers are yet another unnecessary cog in the surveillance state—and one that serves the intrusive function of coordinating surveillance activities and sharing information between federal law enforcement, the national security surveillance apparatus, and local and state police, with little to no oversight. Across the United States, there are at least 78 fusion centers that were formed by the Department of Homeland Security in the wake of the War on Terror and the rise of post-9/11 mass surveillance. Since their creation, fusion centers have been hammered by politicians, academics, and civil society groups for their ineffectiveness, dysfunction, mission creep, and unregulated tendency to veer into policing political views. As scholar Brendan McQuade wrote in his book Pacifying the Homeland: Intelligence Fusion and Mass Supervision: “On paper, fusion centers have the potential to organize dramatic surveillance powers. In practice however, what happens at fusion centers is circumscribed by the politics of law enforcement. The tremendous resources being invested in counterterrorism and the formation of interagency intelligence centers are complicated by organization complexity and jurisdictional rivalries. The result is not a revolutionary shift in policing but the creation of uneven, conflictive, and often dysfunctional intelligence-sharing systems.” An explosive 2023 report from Rutgers University’s Center for Security, Race and Rights also provides more evidence of why these centers are invasive, secretive, and dangerous. In the report, researchers documented how New Jersey’s fusion center leveraged national security powers to spy almost exclusively on Muslim, Arab, and Black communities and push an already racially biased criminal justice system into overdrive through aggressive enforcement of misdemeanor and quality of life offenses. After a series of leaks that revealed communications from within police departments, fusion centers, and law enforcement agencies across the country, MIAC came under particular scrutiny for sharing dubious intelligence generated by far-right wing social media accounts with local law enforcement. Specifically, MIAC helped perpetuate disinformation that stacks of bricks and stones had been strategically placed throughout a Black Lives Matter protest as part of a larger plan for destruction, and caused police to plan and act accordingly. This was, to put it plainly, a government intelligence agency spreading fake news that could have deliberately injured people exercising their First Amendment rights. This controversy unfolded shortly after a whistleblower lawsuit from a state trooper that alleged the fusion center routinely violated civil rights. When it comes to fighting these dangerous relics of the War on Terror, activists in Maine are leading the way for the rest of the country. EFF will continue to support organizations and local groups willing to take on fusion centers in their legislatures. Congratulations to the hard-working activists and concerned residents in Maine. Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Join EFF Lists Discover more. Email updates on news, actions, events in your area, and more. Anti-spam question: Enter the three-letter abbreviation for Electronic Frontier Foundation:

Add Comment

Please describe the call category.


Recent user feedback


+1 (326) 207-2240
  • Penny Wise
    21:04 2024-04-26
    Category: Fraud Calls
    Call from a # that had NO hits on Google (ditto for several of the report sites), hid their caller ID (said "Name Unavailable"), & *2* sites flagged it as either faked or coming from from outside the US! Clearly some sort of scam.
+1 (412) 746-0226
  • Marcy Payne
    02:33 2024-04-26
    Category: Other Calls
    Caller ID said "CALL RESEARCH". Some guy on the line asked for my spouse. "I said, "Not available"; the guy then said he was taking a survey on how "registered" voters voted in the PA Primary (as if I'm NOT?). I said "How WE voted isn't YOUR business!" & hung up.
+1 (412) 703-1446
  • Marcy Payne
    01:23 2024-04-26
    Category: Fraud Calls
    Calling it "Fraud" because the caller hid behind "Name Unavailable" on the caller ID; plus within a minute or 2 of the call coming in, calling back FAILED. Oh and ZERO hits on Google for it, either....
+1 (835) 216-8748
  • Marcy Payne
    00:17 2024-04-26
    Category: Sales Calls
    2 hours after the call from 835-216-8743? This one had NO hits on Google (I'm hopefully FIXING that). But guessing it was the same spammer as the earlier call, just working up through "available" #s to spoof....
+1 (835) 216-8743
  • Marcy Payne
    00:14 2024-04-26
    Category: Sales Calls
    "Name Unavailable" today. Didn't recognize #; almost nothing on Google. 1 site said it was from Canada; another, just that not a valid US number.... ~2 hours later? Another call (same caller ID). That had a different last digit: 835-216-8748 & NO hits on Google!
+1 (717) 914-9861
  • Jane Doe
    21:35 2024-04-25
    Category: Hang up Calls
    No message left. Caller ID just said "HARRISBURG PA". Only 1 hit for the # on Google -- some spurious site with a bunch of fake sounding names listed, which has the domain for Guadeloupe (I checked to see what/where ".gp" was for...).
+1 (412) 520-9250
  • Marcy Payne
    19:12 2024-04-25
    Category: Fraud Calls
    No message left. Caller ID said "PITTSBURGH PA" (yeah, flush left and flush right on the screen -- that's a red flag right there). Another report site ALREADY had this flagged as being a car warranty scam call when I looked the # up.
+1 (610) 795-5855
  • Marcy Payne
    19:10 2024-04-25
    Category: Sales Calls
    Didn't recognize #. Caller ID just said "ARDMORE PA" (yes, with a lot of space in the middle). So picked up and hung up. Only hit on Google was one of those "blogger.com sites with a bunch of fake sounding names they show Google....
Find out more