Area Code: | 949 |
Prefix: | 565 |
Owner name: | Jana Jensen View information |
County | Orange |
City: | Anaheim |
State/Province: | California - CA |
Use Type: | Landline Numbers |
Carrier: | Xo California, Inc. |
International format: | +19495650500 / 0019495650500 |
Time Zone: | Pacific 17:06:04 |
949-565-0500 Suspicious
Here are the caller ID information for 949-565-0500 and comments from other users. If you have any useful information please leave your feedback. You can also mark (949) 565-0500 as safe, unsafe, harassing, hang up, etc. We look forward to any feedback from you to help others.
User Report stats for 9495650500
-
3 user
Harassing calls
These callers are deliberately harassing intentional pranks or perverts that can seriously affect your life.
-
31 user
Debt calls
Usually it is to sell you insurance, car, real estate and other callers. But please be vigilant.
-
2 user
Unknown calls
These calls are calls you haven't heard. You can't be sure who the caller is.
-
3 user
Other calls
This category is the other phone types we have not summarized above.
Comments for 9495650500
Add Comment
Recent user feedback
-
Yuliya F
21:06 2024-05-03
Category: Hang up Calls
"GODDARD KS" called while I was on another (IMPORTANT) call. Went to voicemail but there was no message left. The gap in the middle is generally a flag that it's spam -- and in this case another report site had flagged it as a "Medicare robocall".
-
Yuliya F
21:04 2024-05-03
Category: Fraud Calls
Caller ID said "Cell Phone PA" (that's a new one!). Tried calling back on a phone where I can block incoming calls if needed, and got a message saying "number is not in service"! So clearly some sort of spam or fraud....
-
Yuliya F
21:00 2024-05-03
Category: Sales Calls
"Name Unavailable" did not leave a message even though call went to voicemail. When I looked the # up, I found that # was "invalid" or does not belong to the US"..... So, *clearly* some sort of spam!
-
Yuliya F
20:54 2024-05-03
Category: Fraud Calls
Caller ID said "PARKER, SARA" -- but caller was a guy with a thick Indian accent, who said he was calling from "Diabetic Health". (In reality, the background noise sounded as if he was actually in CALL CENTER. So, spam, and spoofing someone's name and # at that....
-
Marcy Payne
03:04 2024-05-02
Category: Fraud Calls
Can't be legit -- tried calling "BEDMINSTER PA" back and got a message saying "Number not in use" (!) That suggest a scam call using a spoofed #. Do NOT pick up!
-
Marcy Payne
03:01 2024-05-02
Category: Other Calls
Tried calling "SEWICKLEY PA" back; weird recording offering a "savings plan upgrade" (?) -- gift cards to (unnamed stores) or discounts on (unknown) dental office visits (!). NO mention of who's behind this, or what you're going to have to give THEM.... Suspicious!
-
Marcy Payne
02:54 2024-05-02
Category: Fraud Calls
Caller ID said "MCKEESPORT PA". Tried calling back (within a minute or two of the call coming in!) and got a recording saying the number was not in service! Clearly a spammer using a spoofed number!
-
Bianca Lyttle
01:31 2024-05-01
Category: Sales Calls
Another call from this same area code and caller ID as yesterday. No message this time either. Clearly spam and possibly harassment.
+1-949-565-0500 | Category: Sales Calls
This guy is ridiculous. He calls and says he's "in charge of Google Advertising in the area." He's not, he doesn't work for Google. When pushed on this, he's defensive in saying that he is "in charge of Las Vegas advertising" - he means at "his" company, not google. He absolutely know's he's using misleading information, and suggested that our firm could say we were "in charge" of the field we practice. Umm, no... no we can't. We have ethics. I'm sure this tactic works for most people, but it will never work with me. Good bye, Randy.
+1-949-565-0500 | Category: Sales Calls
This guy is ridiculous. He calls and says he's "in charge of Google Advertising in the area." He's not, he doesn't work for Google. When pushed on this, he's defensive in saying that he is "in charge of Las Vegas advertising" - he means at "his" company, not google. He absolutely know's he's using misleading information, and suggested that our firm could say we were "in charge" of the field we practice. Umm, no... no we can't. We have ethics. I'm sure this tactic works for most people, but it will never work with me. Good bye, Randy.