Area Code: | 581 |
Country: | Canada |
State/Province: | Quebec |
Major City: | Alma |
Time Zone: | Eastern |
About 581 : | Area code 581 was first put in service September 19, 2008. To avoid exhausting all possible phone numbers in this area code, relief planning has begun, but it has been . Currently, the largest city it serves is Quebec, QC, and it overlaps coverage areas with area codes 367 and 418. |
Active Prefixes in Area Code 201
Prefix | Primary City | Usage | Company |
---|---|---|---|
581-335-#### | Landline | Telecommunications X... | |
581-336-#### | Landline | Telecommunications X... | |
581-337-#### | Wireless | Bell Mobility... | |
581-338-#### | Landline | Telecommunications X... | |
581-339-#### | Landline | Bell Canada... | |
581-340-#### | Landline | Telecommunications X... | |
581-341-#### | Landline | Telecommunications X... | |
581-342-#### | Landline | Telecommunications X... | |
581-343-#### | Landline | Bell Canada... | |
581-344-#### | Landline | Telecommunications X... | |
581-345-#### | Landline | Telecommunications X... | |
581-346-#### | Landline | Bell Canada... | |
581-347-#### | Landline | Telecommunications X... | |
581-348-#### | Landline | Bell Canada... | |
581-350-#### | Landline | Bell Canada... | |
581-351-#### | Landline | 9144-3036 Quebec Inc... | |
581-352-#### | Landline | 9144-3036 Quebec Inc... | |
581-353-#### | Landline | 9144-3036 Quebec Inc... | |
581-354-#### | Landline | 9144-3036 Quebec Inc... | |
581-355-#### | Landline | 9144-3036 Quebec Inc... | |
581-356-#### | Landline | 9144-3036 Quebec Inc... | |
581-357-#### | Landline | 9144-3036 Quebec Inc... | |
581-358-#### | Landline | 9144-3036 Quebec Inc... | |
581-359-#### | Landline | 9144-3036 Quebec Inc... | |
581-360-#### | Landline | 9144-3036 Quebec Inc... | |
581-361-#### | Landline | 9144-3036 Quebec Inc... | |
581-362-#### | Landline | 9144-3036 Quebec Inc... | |
581-363-#### | Landline | 9144-3036 Quebec Inc... | |
581-364-#### | Landline | 9144-3036 Quebec Inc... | |
581-365-#### | Landline | 9144-3036 Quebec Inc... |
Recent user feedback
-
Marcy Payne
18:08 2024-04-29
Category: Fraud Calls
Calling it fraud because that's what reports on another site said when I Google the #. Caller ID just said "JOHNSTOWN PA" (the gap, pushing the info to the edges of the screen, is often a red flag of spam calls).
-
Bianca Lyttle
13:50 2024-04-29
Category: Sales Calls
Didn't recognize # (neither did Google). Caller ID said "COATESVILLE PA" (gap in the middle is generally a red flag). Tried calling # on my cell; got a message saying "Please call back from the number we called" (!) Uh, no -- not happening!
-
Jane Doe
12:39 2024-04-29
Category: Sales Calls
And another™ call from "Name Unavailable". Didn't recognize the # any more than any of the OTHER spam calls I get. NO hits for the # on Google at ALL (I'm hopefully fixing that -- you're welcome...).
-
Penny Wise
11:50 2024-04-29
Category: Fraud Calls
Legit organization's #, but spoofed by some scammer. They now know about this (my recommendation was to contact the FBI about the fake call).
-
Penny Wise
17:04 2024-04-26
Category: Fraud Calls
Call from a # that had NO hits on Google (ditto for several of the report sites), hid their caller ID (said "Name Unavailable"), & *2* sites flagged it as either faked or coming from from outside the US! Clearly some sort of scam.
-
Marcy Payne
22:33 2024-04-25
Category: Other Calls
Caller ID said "CALL RESEARCH". Some guy on the line asked for my spouse. "I said, "Not available"; the guy then said he was taking a survey on how "registered" voters voted in the PA Primary (as if I'm NOT?). I said "How WE voted isn't YOUR business!" & hung up.
-
Marcy Payne
21:23 2024-04-25
Category: Fraud Calls
Calling it "Fraud" because the caller hid behind "Name Unavailable" on the caller ID; plus within a minute or 2 of the call coming in, calling back FAILED. Oh and ZERO hits on Google for it, either....
-
Marcy Payne
20:17 2024-04-25
Category: Sales Calls
2 hours after the call from 835-216-8743? This one had NO hits on Google (I'm hopefully FIXING that). But guessing it was the same spammer as the earlier call, just working up through "available" #s to spoof....